Outreach channels for polar science: an expedition to Kerguelen Islands as a case study

Eduardo Dopico, Eva Garcia-Vazquez

PDF(629 KB)
Advances in Polar Science ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1) : 31-38.
Reviews

Outreach channels for polar science: an expedition to Kerguelen Islands as a case study

  • Eduardo Dopico1*, Eva Garcia-Vazquez2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Polar science outreach is strongly needed, because besides promoting the utility of polar studies for society as a whole, it can generate public demand for new projects and expeditions. The dissemination of polar discoveries should be reinforced in countries without polar territories and for which polar science might not be a priority. In this pilot study (N=182 participants) we have contrasted the opinions of polar scientists (French, Belgian, British, Canadian, Australian, German, Italian and Spanish researchers) with those of a potentially interested public (graduate students of pedagogy and biology), in order to assess if the communication channels employed by polar researchers to make their results public align with those used by non-polar experts for learning about polar discoveries. The results revealed that scientific publications and presentations were considered a priority by the researchers, and these scientific communication channels were preferentially employed. Only a minority of researchers thought that non-scientific publications might be a good communication resource. In contrast, both groups of students, which considered polar research important but not a top priority, employed the Internet as their main channel for information about polar discoveries. Students assessed the use of polar discoveries as positive for educational purposes at both Primary and Secondary levels. The information presently received by students was perceived as being too generalist and the main suggestions to improve outreach in this field, in addition to the use of Internet, were more rapid dissemination of new discoveries.

Key words

polar research / outreach / ethnography / scientific communication channels

Cite this article

Download Citations
Eduardo Dopico, Eva Garcia-Vazquez. Outreach channels for polar science: an expedition to Kerguelen Islands as a case study. Advances in Polar Science. 2016, 27(1): 31-38

References

1 Putzke J, Pereira A B. The Antarctic mosses with special reference to the South Shetland Islands. Brazil: Editora da Ulbra, 2001 2 Bulkeley R. Bellingshausen and the Russian Antarctic expedition, 1819-21. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 3 www.nzaht.org/AHT/HistoryCapeAdare/, 2016]]> 4 Sánchez E. Atrapados en el fin del mundo. La epopeya Antártica olvidada (Caught in the end of the world. The Antarctic forgotten epic). Argentina: Digiart Producciones, 2003 5 Amundsen R. My life as an explorer. New York: Amberley Publishing, 2009 6 Haddon A C. The study of man. London: Murray, 1908 7 Amicale des Missions Australeset Polaires Françaises. AMAPOF Mémoire à plusieurs voix, 50 ans de souvenirs polaires (Remembrances with many voices. 50 years of polar memories), Tome 2. France: Editions Amapof, 2008 8 Maw S J, Mauchline A L, Park J R. Biological fieldwork provision in higher education. Biosci Ed, 2011, 17(1): 1-14, doi: 10.3108/beej.17.1 DOI:10.3108/beej.17.1 9 Kofinas G, Osherenko G, Klein D, et al. Research planning in the face of change: the human role in reindeer/caribou systems. Polar Res, 2000, 19(1): 3-21 DOI:10.1111/por.2000.19.issue-1 10 Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science, 1998, 279(5350): 491-497 DOI:10.1126/science.279.5350.491 11 Russo G. Outreach: meet the press. Nature, 2010, 468(7322): 465- 467, doi: 10.1038/nj7322-465a DOI:10.1038/nj7322-465a 12 Cheek J, Huyge B, de Pomereu J. Princess Elisabeth Antarctica: an International Polar Year outreach and media success story. Polar Res, 2011, 30: 11153, doi: 10.3402/polar.v30i0.11153 DOI:10.3402/polar.v30i0.11153 13 Parmentier F J W, Christensen T R, Sørensen L L, et al. The impact of lower sea-ice extent on Arctic greenhouse-gas exchange. Nat Climate Change, 2013, 3(3): 195-202, doi: 10.1038/nclimate1784 DOI:10.1038/nclimate1784 14 Salmon R A, Carlson D J, Zicus S, et al. Education, outreach and communication during the International Polar Year 2007-2008: stimulating a global polar community. Polar J, 2011, 1(2): 265-85, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2011.626629 DOI:10.1080/2154896X.2011.626629 15 Provencher J, Baeseman J, Carlson D, et al. Polar research education, outreach and communication during the fourth IPY: how the 2007-2008 International Polar Year has contributed to the future of education, outreach and communication. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU), 2011 16 Auer-Srnka K J, Koeszegi S T. From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Bus Rev, 2007, 59(1): 29-57 17 Cooper J, Lewis R, Urquhart C. Using participant or non-participant observation to explain information behaviour. Inform Res, 2015, 9(4): 184 18 Anderson L. Analytic autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr, 2006, 35(4): 373-395 DOI:10.1177/0891241605280449 19 Taylor S J, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods: the search for meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1984 20 Xia J F. An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices. J Document, 2011, 67(1): 75-94, doi: 10.1108/00220411111105461 DOI:10.1108/00220411111105461 21 Ellis C. Telling secrets, revealing lives: relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qual Inq, 2010, 13(1): 3-29 22 Mckernan J. Curriculum action research: a handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner, 2nd edn. UK: Routledge, 1996 23 Yin R K. Case study research. Design and methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003 24 Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res, 2006, 6(1): 97-113, doi: 10.1177/1468794106058877 DOI:10.1177/1468794106058877 25 Henry D, Dymnicki A B, Mohatt N, et al. Clustering methods with qualitative data: a mixed-methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevent Sci, 2015, 16(7): 1007-1116, doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0561-z DOI:10.1007/s11121-015-0561-z 26 Maxwell J A. Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res, 2016, 10(1): 12-27, doi: 10.1177/1558689815571132 DOI:10.1177/1558689815571132 27 http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/18,2007]]> 28 Shannon-Baker P. Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res, 2015, 20, doi: 10.1177/1558689815575861 DOI:10.1177/1558689815575861 29 Jucan M S, Jucan C N. The power of science communication. Proc Social Behav Sci, 2014, 149: 461-466,doi: 10.1016/ j.sbspro.2014.08.288 DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.288 30 Oh P S. Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students presenting their science investigations. Int J Sci Ed, 2005, 27(15): 1825-1851, doi: 10.1080/09500690500239714 DOI:10.1080/09500690500239714 31 Rasmussen R O. Gender and generation: perspectives on ongoing social and environmental changes in the Arctic. Signs, 2009, 34(3): 524-532 DOI:10.1086/593342 32 Natalia K. Climate change effects on human health in a gender perspective: some trends in Arctic research. Global Health Action, 2011, 4: 7913, doi: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.7913 DOI:10.3402/gha.v4i0.7913 33 Ecklund E H, James S A, Lincoln A E. How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PLoS One, 2012, 7(5): e36240, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036240 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0036240 34 Knobloch-Westerwick S, Glynn C J, Huge M. The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Sci Commun, 2013, 35(5): 603-625, doi: 10.1177/1075547012472684 DOI:10.1177/1075547012472684 35 Joober R, Schmitz N, Annable L, et al. Publication bias: what are the challenges and can they be overcome? J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2012, 37(3): 149-152 DOI:10.1503/jpn.110175 36 Leshner A I. Outreach training needed. Science, 2007, 315(5809): 161, doi: 10.1126/science.1138712 DOI:10.1126/science.1138712 37 Steiner A. Why “Melting Ice” as a topic for the World Environment Day? Polar Res, 2007, 26(2): 93-95, doi: 10.1111/j.1751- 8369.2007.00034.x DOI:10.1111/j.1751-8369.2007.00034.x 38 May I, Carlson D, Ardyna M, et al. Making science animations: new possibilities for making science accessible to the public. Polar Res, 2011, 30: 15315, doi: 10.3402/polar.v30i0.15315 DOI:10.3402/polar.v30i0.15315 39 Herzog W. Encounters at the end of the world. Think Film: Henry Kaiser Production, 2007
PDF(629 KB)

733

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/